Energy security
Attacks outweigh Russia's diesel offer as oil climbs
Additional Russian fuel supplies are easing diesel prices without removing the threat to crude shipments through the Gulf.
Oil prices reversed early losses on October 12, 2026, as attacks on Saudi Arabia outweighed expectations of additional Russian supplies. At 15:07 GMT, Brent futures were up 2% at $106.76 a barrel; US West Texas Intermediate traded at $93.69.
The Iran-aligned Houthis claimed weekend attacks on Riyadh's international airport. United Kingdom Maritime Trade Operations also reported a tanker struck near Oman's Sohar and another damaged while transiting the Strait of Hormuz, threatening the recovery in Middle Eastern exports.
Russia partially lifted its diesel export ban on October 10 following an agreement between Vladimir Putin and Donald Trump. Deputy prime minister Alexander Novak said production could cover domestic demand and the agreed exports. Trump had promised an initial supply exceeding 300,000 metric tons; ICE gasoil futures fell 2.3% to $1,449 a metric ton.
The diplomatic premise remained disputed. On October 12, Ukrainian president Volodymyr Zelenskiy accused Russia of breaching Trump's announced energy ceasefire by striking a thermal power plant in Kharkiv. Kyiv was still awaiting the agreement's terms, while the European Union approved further sanctions against Russia's military-industrial complex.
The divergent fuel prices suggest that extra refined-product supply does not remove the risk to crude shipments. Goldman Sachs raised its December Brent forecast to $90 from $85, reflecting continuing concern about supply disruption.
Sources: Reuters: Oil prices rise as attacks overshadow Trump's diesel dealReuters: Russia partially lifts its diesel export banReuters: Ukraine accuses Russia of violating the energy ceasefire
Five economists read this story
- William Stanley JevonsJevons would examine industrial dependence on energy and the limited scope for rapid substitution when essential fuel supplies become insecure.
- Harold HotellingHotelling would distinguish the price of underlying resource scarcity from the additional premium created by disrupted access to supplies.
- John Maynard KeynesKeynes would focus on how higher fuel bills weaken household demand and investment even as they raise measured inflation.
- Isabella WeberWeber would ask whether targeted measures addressing energy bottlenecks could contain inflation more effectively than economy-wide demand restraint.
- Albert HirschmanHirschman would see dependence on particular suppliers and shipping routes as a source of political leverage as well as economic vulnerability.